For the past several year we have sat through the debate on I69 and how
to spend the federal highway funds on new and exiting interstate
highway that some governors name will be on. After listening to our all
our governors future plans on this monument one must come to the
conclusion that it has more to do with something thats wanted more than
needed. This highway is needed by US companies shipping jobs out and
illegal aliens in. This means it fails the taxpayer test.
One can conclude, after seeing the exposed bridge conditions and inspection results, that these funds should be used to make safe the infrastructure now in place and not build future monuments to their administrations. After our hazardous bridges are really safe then look beyond. This is what the councils "public safety" money should be spent on instead of new real estate that we can get by without. Which also fails the taxpayers test. !Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)
One can conclude, after seeing the exposed bridge conditions and inspection results, that these funds should be used to make safe the infrastructure now in place and not build future monuments to their administrations. After our hazardous bridges are really safe then look beyond. This is what the councils "public safety" money should be spent on instead of new real estate that we can get by without. Which also fails the taxpayers test. !Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)
